Read the latest message
Apple's newest response is the current source of truth. Older rejection details can be useful context, but they should not drive the next fix.
Start with Apple's latest message. AiSCent helps turn it into a plain explanation of what they flagged, what needs attention, and what to do next.
Use the newest message first—especially if you already fixed an earlier rejection.
The job here is not to create more urgency. You already have urgency. The job is to turn a vague or formal review message into one specific next move.
AiSCent should preserve what is already working, connect the review message to the relevant release state, and make the smallest sensible correction first.
Apple's newest response is the current source of truth. Older rejection details can be useful context, but they should not drive the next fix.
Plain language first: what is Apple objecting to, and is it the app, the store page, a purchase, or information they need for review?
When AiSCent can inspect the affected work, it should reread the resulting state instead of assuming the change stuck.
No. A rejection is a review result tied to specific issues. The productive question is what changed requirement or missing detail is blocking this submission.
Usually the safer strategy is the smallest change that directly addresses the stated issue, then verify it.
AiSCent can help identify what is known, what is inferred, and what still needs clarification instead of pretending certainty.
No. Apple controls review. AiSCent can help you prepare and verify the work it handles.
Scott Manthey has submitted nearly 100 of his own apps and previously submitted apps for other developers. AiSCent turns those repeated checks into a guided process your coding agent can use.
Apple still controls App Review. AiSCent helps you prepare, understand what is missing, and fix the work it can verify; it does not promise approval.
Start with the latest rejection, not another generic App Store checklist.
See what's left →